In Milton's research, we can see a provocative demonstration of how people who have power can control the behavior of fathers, you know, understanding of the social psychological factors that produce obedience. Help us explain the events that occurred in 2004. at Apple, right, the Iraqi prison in which US soldiers physically and psychologically tortured their Iraqi prisoners, the social psychologist Philip Zimbardo team so he knows the parallels between the events that occurred at Apple right and the events that occurred in the presence study that he conducted in 1971. In that study, Zimbardo and his colleagues set up a mock prison. They selected 23 student volunteers and divided them into two groups. One group was chosen to be the prisoners and they were picked up in their homes. They actually actual police officers arrested and brought to the prison to be guarded.
By the other group of students, which are mythic, our little groups were placed in a setting that was designed to look like a real prison and the roleplay began. The study was expected to run for two weeks. However, on the second day the prisoners try to rebel against the guards. The guards quickly move to stop the revelation by using both psychological punishment and physical abuse. In these during these, the guards denied the prisoners food, water and sleep, shut them with fire extinguisher sprayed through their blankets into the dirt forced them to clean toilet bowls with their bare hands and sweep them me. On the night the experimenters witness the guard putting bags over the prisoners head, changing their legs and washing them around.
To this point, a former student who was not involved with a study spoke up requiring the treatment of the prisoners to be immoral. As a result, the researchers stuff thanks Experiment early. the conclusions of the bottles research are seemingly clear people may be so profoundly influenced by their social situation that they were become cold hearted Jill masters who tortured their victims. Arguably, this conclusion may be applied to the research that itself which seemingly neglected ethical principles in the pursuit of your research course. Zimbardo 's research may help us understand the events that occurred at Apple drive and mode three prison used by US military following the successful toppling of dictators have set them on scene. Zimbardo acted as an expert witness in the trial of search and chip Frederick, who was sentenced to eight years in prison for his role in the abuse of Abu Ghraib.
Frederick was that army reservists who was put in charge of the nightshift fire, what he Where did the themes were abused? During this trial, Frederick said, what I did was wrong and I don't understand why I did it. Zimbabwe That product acted exactly like the students in the prison study, he worked in a prison that was overcrowded, both the invaders in where he was expected to maintain control over the rock of prisoners. In short, the situation he found himself in was very similar to that of the modern prison study. In a recent interview was in bottle argue, and we can tell that he's a social psychologist, that human behavior is more influenced by things outside of us that inside he believes that despite our moral and religious beliefs, and despite the inherent goodness of people, there are times when external circumstances can overwhelm us and we will do things that we never thought we were capable of doing.
He argued that if you are not aware that this can happen, you can be seduced by evil. We need inoculation against our own potential for evil. We have to acknowledge it, then we can change it. You may wonder whether the extremely havior of the gods and prisoners in Zimbardo prison study was unique to the particle social conflict that he created. A recent research by even awry Riker and Alex Haslam suggests that this is indeed the case. In the research, they recreated Zimbardo prison study while making some small but important changes.
For one, the prisoners were not arrested before the study began and the setup of the jail was less realistic. Furthermore, the researchers in this experiment told the guards and the prisoners that the groups were arbitrary and could change over time that is that some prisoners might be able to be promoted to guards. The results of the study were entirely different than those found by the bottom. The study was also stopped early, but more because he the guards felt uncomfortable in their superior position then because the prisoners were being abused. This prison simply didn't feel like real prison to the party Sapiens. And as a result, you They didn't take on the roles they were assigned.
Again, the conclusions are clear the specifics of the social situation more than the people themselves, are often the most important determinants of behavior.